7.5 Attaching Contracts to Values
(provide/contract p/c-item ...) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The provide/contract form treats modules as units of blame. The module that defines the provided variable is expected to meet the positive (co-variant) positions of the contract. Each module that imports the provided variable must obey the negative (contra-variant) positions of the contract.
Only uses of the contracted variable outside the module are checked. Inside the module, no contract checking occurs.
The rename form of a provide/contract exports the first variable (the internal name) with the name specified by the second variable (the external name).
The struct form of a provide/contract clause provides a structure-type definition, and each field has a contract that dictates the contents of the fields. The structure-type definition must appear before the provide clause within the enclosing module. If the structure type has a parent, the second struct form (above) must be used, with the first name referring to the structure type to export and the second name referring to the parent structure type. Unlike a struct definition, however, all of the fields (and their contracts) must be listed. The contract on the fields that the sub-struct shares with its parent are only used in the contract for the sub-struct’s constructor, and the selector or mutators for the super-struct are not provided. The exported structure-type name always doubles as a constructor, even if the original structure-type name does not act as a constructor.
The #:∃ and #:exists clauses define new abstract contracts. The variables are bound in the remainder of the provide/contract expression to new contracts that hide the values they accept and ensure that the exported functions are treated parametrically.
The implementation of provide/contract attaches uses syntax-property to attach properties to the code it generates that records the syntax of the contracts in the fully expanded program. Specifically, the symbol 'provide/contract-original-contract is bound to vectors of two elements, the exported identifier and a syntax object for the expression that produces the contract controlling the export.
7.5.1 Nested Contract Boundaries
(require racket/contract/region) |
(with-contract blame-id (wc-export ...) free-var-list ... body ...+) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(with-contract blame-id results-spec free-var-list ... body ...+) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The first with-contract form cannot appear in expression position. All names defined within the first with-contract form are visible externally, but those names listed in the wc-export list are protected with the corresponding contract. The body of the form allows definition/expression interleaving if its context does.
The second with-contract form must appear in expression position. The final body expression should return the same number of values as the number of contracts listed in the result-spec, and each returned value is contracted with its respective contract. The sequence of body forms is treated as for let.
The blame-id is used for the positive positions of contracts paired with exported ids. Contracts broken within the with-contract body will use the blame-id for their negative position.
If a free-var-list is given, then any uses of the free variables inside the body will be protected with contracts that blame the context of the with-contract form for the positive positions and the with-contract form for the negative ones.
(define/contract id contract-expr free-var-list init-value-expr) |
(define/contract (head args) contract-expr free-var-list body ...+) |
The define/contract form treats the individual definition as a contract region. The definition itself is responsible for positive (co-variant) positions of the contract, and references to id outside of the definition must meet the negative positions of the contract. Since the contract boundary is between the definition and the surrounding context, references to id inside the define/contract form are not checked.
If a free-var-list is given, then any uses of the free variables inside the body will be protected with contracts that blame the context of the define/contract form for the positive positions and the define/contract form for the negative ones.
| |||
|
The define-struct/contract form only allows a subset of the struct-option keywords: #:mutable, #:transparent, #:auto-value, #:omit-define-syntaxes, #:property and #:omit-define-values.
Examples: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
7.5.2 Low-level Contract Boundaries
| |||
|
The contract expression adds the contract specified by contract-expr to the value produced by to-protect-expr. The result of a contract expression is the result of the to-protect-expr expression, but with the contract specified by contract-expr enforced on to-protect-expr.
The values of positive-blame-expr and negative-blame-expr indicate how to assign blame for positive and negative positions of the contract specified by contract-expr. They may be any value, and are formatted as by display for purposes of contract violation error messages.
If specified, value-name-expr indicates a name for the protected value to be used in error messages. If not supplied, or if value-name-expr produces #f, no name is printed. Otherwise, it is also formatted as by display.
If specified, source-location-expr indicates the source location reported by contract violations. The expession must produce a srcloc structure, syntax object, #f, or a list or vector in the format accepted by the third argument to datum->syntax.